Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Equal Opportunities Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Equal Opportunities Act. Show all posts

Thursday, 9 February 2012

Above the law

Is it only me...but this is not legal.

I was hoping that these words would provide a safe haven and refuge from all the hysteria surrounding the sacking of England’s Head Honcho in charge of football but sadly we must intervene with some words of wit and caution.

Now to be honest when it comes to England and football I adopt ‘A Gone with the Wind’ approach and quite frankly, I couldn’t give a damn. However it does incense me when despite everything else going on in the world the broadcast media in this country seem to have made the editorial decision that this is the only thing that matters to anyone. Really? And it was for this reason that I was going to ignore it and I apologise to all you good folk for breaching this vow to myself. I am so weak!

Putting to one side the observation that if I was alleged to have made racist remarks in my workplace, I would be suspended forthwith; and ignoring the fact that no one else I know, though I do know very few in this position, has the power to arrange their court schedule to suit their diary; there is one other aspect of this issue that sorely troubles me and provides yet further evidence that football and those who play this game seem to think that they are above the law.

From every corner of the green and pleasant land that many have come to call England, the cry has gone up, with the vigour and emotional loquacity of Henry V before Agincourt, that the next England Head Honcho must be an Englishman.

This is illegal.

Under EU law there is freedom of movement of labour meaning that English jobs cannot be reserved for Englishmen and that any EU national has the right to be considered for any job within the EU. I don’t think, though I might be wrong, that when the various EU treaties incorporating this right were being discussed, that anyone on our side of the discussions negotiated a veto or opt out from this directive for England Head Honchos in charge of soccer.

I also believe UK law also applies here and that women too must be considered for this role and given equal opportunity to apply and be considered. The same applies to every other minority in this country though it baffles me how women can be considered a minority though in world of Soccer Head Honchos operating at a senior level we are still waiting for that Maggie Thatcher moment.

It might only be me but soccer is not above the law and to apply the law in the case of England’s Head Honcho, the best person regardless of gender, race, age and creed must be given the job, provided of course they were born in the EU or have the relevant work permit.

And I offer this advice as a well-meaning Celt who only wants to see England do well! And that was said with all sincerity.

Have a great week.

Sis felix. Et sis fortunatus.

Monday, 23 January 2012

Women and children first

Is it only me...but why?

The recent tragedy of the sinking Italian cruise liner when it was alleged that ‘the women and children first’ rule was not followed, has set me thinking. We always know this is a dangerous thing for me to do but it has happened and so I thought I would share my wisdom with you. How lucky does that make you?

Now I accept that this might be the polite thing to do and certainly as a man of considerable charm, albeit kept well hidden, this is of course how I would behave should I ever be unlucky enough to find myself in such tragic circumstances.

And you can bet your bottom dollar that should my office space ever begin to incendiarize I will clarify any doubt that might exist in the minds of my co-workers and highlight that our door is clearly labelled fire exit and even hold open said fire exit until every woman and child has left the room.
However I do believe that such a policy might be illegal.

Under Equal Opportunities legislation so beloved of the feministas and other bleeding heart liberals, it has to be the best person for the job, irrespective of gender and age who would have to go first. On this basis, if you are going to get into a boat, especially if it requires rowing, I would like to suggest that the best people for the job and therefore those who should get in first would be those with any sailing or rowing ability. It goes without saying that if strength and stamina were required to ensure that the boat had the strength to make land, these are more likely to be male traits than female.

And I haven’t even mentioned navigation skills!

It should also be pointed out that the Guardianista-inspired Human Rights Act guarantees us all a right to life, to family life and to marriage. I do not recall anywhere that these rights were determined by gender though clearly you have more of these rights than anyone else if you are an illegal immigrant facing deportation. Therefore anyone denied a right to a lifeboat space on basis that they were not a woman or a child, would have a very good case at Strasbourg. Of course no one would be able to get off the boat until all the illegal immigrants had got off otherwise they would be heading to Strasbourg too.

Now it might only be me but this perfectly illustrates the legal and moral dilemmas that arise from simplistic statements such as ‘women and children first’. And so I would contend that it might be better and more legally sound if we adopted the maxim of ‘every person for him or herself’.

Have a great week.

Sis felix. Et sis fortunatus